On last week
there was a standing room crowd only at Prichard City Hall, and on this week it
moved to the Courthouse and landed in Judge Charles Garrick courtroom on
yesterday.
There is a looming fight over former Police Chief Jimmie Gardner
whom the newly elected mayor Troy Ephriam terminated due to a reasonable fact
of law. (His contract had expired.)
For a man that
once was the head of the local Mobile County NAACP, and was supposed to been
fighting for equal justice and fairness, and even upholding the law, seems to
not be abiding or willing to abide by the law himself.
In this battle for the police chief position in the city of Prichard should not be in the court hands in the first place. This is another show of a power grab by a certain group of people or individuals called the (Group of Five), which the city is trying to move away from and create a new image. But there is a fight and it’s all about power and control from the group of five.
Attorney E.J. Saad who is representing the former police chief said Gardner's firing was a "retaliation of bringing an ethics violation against the mayor."
On yesterday
Ossa Edwards was the only councilwoman to testify on behalf of Gardner and said
she supported the five-year agreements – which were presented while Ron Davis,
Ephriam's political opponent, was still mayor – because of Gardner's
performance.
"He
exhibited professionalism, honesty and loyalty," Edwards said. "My
belief is if it's not broken, why fix it?" quoted by the Mobile Register
or AL.com.
Ossa Edwards it
is broken, so it does needs to be fixed, meaning the contract is broken and not
correct. I wonder do she needs to even be on the council and not understand the
basics of governing and been there for now two terms.
How can she petition for a recall election and be successful, when she didn’t even get enough support to even get herself in a decent run-off election to even try and lead the city of Prichard, not only that win an election.
Carter said a
contract voted on by the City Council on Oct. 25 – 11 days before
Ephriam was sworn in as mayor -- was invalid because it did not have the
approval of four council members. Only three voted in favor of it. It was also
a five year agreement, whereas previous agreements were no longer than two
years.
The council also
voted on Gardner's contract on March 22. Again, that vote did not muster four
votes Carter claims is legally required for it to be valid.







